The 4 UX metrics that matter

Why most product/UX/UR designers track the wrong stuff.

Jun 22, 2025

TL;DR
UX metrics help teams make smarter decisions by showing where users succeed, struggle, and drop off. But with 70+ metrics to choose from, most teams get lost in the data. Here’s a simpler way: focus on just 4 metrics that actually reflect the real user experience — especially if you work in personalization or product optimization.

There are 70+ UX Metrics.

But let’s be honest: 70+ UX metrics? Ain’t nobody got time for that.

You only need 4!!!

Source: https://measuringu.com/an-overview-of-70-ux-metrics/

If you care about real impact — smoother experiences, fewer drop-offs, and products people enjoy — start here.

I’ve tested a lot of metrics. Some look good on slides. Some win arguments. But only a few help you make better product decisions. These are the four I keep coming back to in my product design work:

Task Completion Rate (TCR)

Source: https://medium.com/@ux.rurik/ux-measurement-the-importance-and-application-of-task-success-rate-ae7c3df2d845

What it measures: Effectiveness

Why it matters: No completion = no value delivered

Use it for: Flows, features, onboarding

2. Single Ease Question (SEQ)

Source: https://measuringu.com/evolution-of-seq/

What it is: After a task, ask: “How easy was this?” (1 = hard, 7 = easy)

Why I care: This is the quickest pulse check on perceived usability.

How we use it in personalization: We often test if a dynamic homepage or personalized CTA actually makes life easier, not harder.

3. Time on Task (TOT)

Source: https://medium.com/@ux.rurik/time-on-task-as-a-ux-metric-the-key-to-a-better-user-experience-and-more-efficient-digital-fecce9968dd4

What it is: How long it takes to complete a task.

Why I care: Speed matters, but context matters more. Longer time isn’t always bad — unless it comes with frustration.

Caveat: Don’t chase faster if it leads to worse decisions (e.g., rushed purchases or bounces).

4. UX-Lite

What it is: A quick 2-question study measuring perceived ease-of-use and usefulness.

Why I care: It’s the MVP of attitudinal study-level metrics — simple, scalable, and surprisingly insightful.

When to use: Post-test surveys, especially after a new personalization feature rollout.

Why these 4?

Completion = success
SEQ = effort
Time = efficiency
UX-Lite = perception

Together, they give you a 360° view of what users do and how they feel.

Skip the fancy, start with impact

UserZoom survey has shown that 81% of executives recognize the value of UX, but only 59% of them claim that they can effectively measure it.

I’ve seen teams obsess over niche metrics like EEG signals or eye-tracking heatmaps. Cool? Yes. Useful? Rarely.

Instead, build a reliable metrics stack. Start with these 4. Nail the basics. Add the fancy stuff later.

Want to geek out with the full 70+ UX metrics taxonomy? Check out the visual here: MeasuringU UX Metrics Map

Happy to share.

👋 Let’s be friends! Follow me on Substack, on X, and connect with me on LinkedIn. Don’t forget to follow me here on Medium as well for more design-related content.

Nurkhon’s Substack

Discussion about this post